US Congressman Riley Moore Warns India’s FCRA Bill Could Hurt India-US Ties, Raises Christian Rights Concerns 
Amerifresh Inc halts iceberg lettuce purchases from Mexico over outbreak concerns. 
US Revokes Visa of Brazil’s Ambassador Antonio Patriota. 
Google showcases AI-generated films 
Naomi Watts voices E.V in Spider-Man: Brand New Day film. Trump Defamation Suit Dismissed Against Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch
“A US federal judge has dismissed a defamation lawsuit brought by Donald Trump against the Wall Street Journal and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, citing the First Amendment’s protection of opinion-based reporting. The lawsuit sought at least $10 billion in damages over a 2020 article critical of Trump’s COVID-19 response.”
In a significant ruling, a US federal judge in Florida dismissed a defamation lawsuit brought by President Donald Trump against the Wall Street Journal and its owner, Rupert Murdoch. The lawsuit, filed last summer, sought at least $10 billion in damages.
Trump had taken issue with a June 2020 article written by the Journal’s publisher’s Washington bureau chief, James Taranto, in which he criticized Trump’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The article referenced a White House report that suggested the US had more positive cases of COVID-19 than other countries. The former president claimed the piece was defamatory, citing a supposed contradiction in the report, but the Journal’s publisher maintained the article was accurate and fair reporting.
The lawsuit, which named the Wall Street Journal’s parent company, News Corp, as a defendant, was seen by many as part of Trump’s ongoing efforts to silence media outlets critical of his presidency. However, News Corp argued that the article was newsworthy and did not contain any false statements.
US District Judge Rodney Smith ultimately sided with News Corp, ruling that the article in question was opinion-based and protected by the First Amendment. Smith’s decision highlights the challenges faced by public figures when seeking to hold media outlets accountable for perceived slights or inaccuracies in reporting.
As a high-stakes defamation case, the outcome has implications for free speech and the media’s role in holding public figures accountable. The dismissal of Trump’s lawsuit comes as the former president is facing increased scrutiny from media outlets and courts nationwide.
The decision has sparked debate among journalists and experts who argue that the ruling is a reminder of the First Amendment’s role in safeguarding free speech and ensuring the public’s right to a free press.
This is a developing story. Stay tuned for more updates.
This is a developing story. Stay tuned for more updates.
