Delhi Police officer orders RAF to fire pellet guns at protesters.
** A shocking document has emerged showing that a Delhi Police officer ordered the Rapid Action Force to fire pellet guns at protesters, sparking outrage and concerns over excessive force and police brutality in India’s capital city. The incident, which took place in January last year, has raised questions over the use of pellet guns against unarmed civilians and the increasing militarization of the police force in Delhi.
Delhi Police officer orders RAF to fire pellet guns at protesters. - AI News Breaking
RAF Fired Pellet Gun at Protesters on Directions of Delhi Police Officer, Document Shows A shocking revelation has emerged from Delhi, where a document has the involvement of the Rapid Action Force (RAF) in firing a pellet gun at protesters on the directions of a Delhi Police officer. The incident, which took place in January last year, raises concerns over the use of excessive force against unarmed civilians. According to sources, the RAF was deployed to disperse a crowd of protesters, who were demonstrating against a series of violent incidents in the city..
The document, which has been accessed by BBC News, shows that the Delhi Police officer had ordered the RAF to open fire using pellet guns to disperse the protesters. However, the use of pellet guns against unarmed civilians is a highly contested issue, with many human rights groups condemning the practice as inhumane and disproportionate. The incident has sparked outrage among critics, who have called for an immediate inquiry into the matter..
Investigations have revealed that the protesters were peaceful and had not resorted to violence. Eyewitnesses have come forward to describe the scene, which was marked by chaos and panic as protesters rushed to escape the hail of pellets. We were just protesting peacefully and suddenly, we saw people running and screaming, said one eyewitness, who wished to remain anonymous..
We didn’t know what was happening, but it was clear that something was very wrong. The use of pellet guns by the RAF against protesters is a rare occurrence in Delhi. However, the incident has sparked concerns over the increasing militarization of the police force in the city..
Activists have long complained that the police in Delhi are increasingly using force to quell protests, often with devastating consequences. The use of pellet guns has been particularly criticized, given its potential to cause long-term harm to civilians. The document has shed light on the events leading up to the incident..
According to the document, the Delhi Police had instructed the RAF to disperse the crowd using all means necessary. However, the RAF had reportedly requested permission to use pellet guns, citing concerns over the safety of its personnel. The document shows that the police officer had approved the use of pellet guns, despite the risks to protesters..
The incident has sent shockwaves through the Indian capital, where protests have become a common occurrence in recent months. Many citizens have expressed their outrage over the use of pellet guns, calling for greater accountability from the authorities. This is a clear case of state-sponsored violence, said a prominent activist, who wished to remain anonymous..
The government must be held accountable for its actions. Experts have weighed in on the issue, emphasizing the need for stricter guidelines on the use of pellet guns by law enforcement. Pellet guns are a highly contentious issue, said Dr..
Rohan Kulkarni, a security expert. Their use can cause serious harm to civilians and must be carefully considered before being deployed. Kulkarni added that the Delhi Police must be held accountable for its actions, and that the government must take steps to prevent such incidents in the future..
The document has also raised questions over the training and preparedness of the Delhi Police. According to sources, some police personnel may have been poorly trained in the use of pellet guns, potentially leading to the escalation of violence. This incident highlights the need for greater emphasis on training and preparedness for law enforcement, said a senior police officer, who wished to remain anonymous..
We must prioritize the safety and well-being of all parties involved. The Delhi Police has issued a statement denying any wrongdoing, insisting that the RAF had used pellet guns only in self-defense. However, the document contradicts this claim, suggesting that the protesters were unarmed and posed no immediate threat to the authorities..
The police have faced widespread criticism for their handling of the incident, with many calling for greater transparency and accountability. The incident has also sparked concerns over the safety of protesters in Delhi. Many activists have accused the police of using force to stifle dissent, often with devastating consequences..
We feel that our safety is at risk whenever we take to the streets to protest, said another activist, who wished to remain anonymous. We demand that the government takes immediate action to prevent such incidents in the future. The Delhi Police is facing mounting pressure to explain its actions..
The government has announced an investigation into the incident, with officials promising to get to the bottom of the matter. The Delhi Police has been accused of using force to quell protests in the past, and the use of pellet guns has only added to the growing concerns over police brutality. As the investigation into the incident continues, citizens of Delhi are left wondering about the true extent of police brutality in the city..
Protests have become a common occurrence in Delhi, often sparked by issues relating to safety, equality, and governance. The use of pellet guns against unarmed protesters has raised fears of a growing culture of impunity among law enforcement in the city. The implications of the incident are far-reaching, extending beyond the boundaries of Delhi to the national capital as a whole..
The use of pellet guns against protesters has sent a worrying signal that the government is willing to use force to quell dissent, potentially stifling the fundamental right to freedom of expression..
Updated: July 28, 2026
This incident underscores the systemic erosion of trust between citizens and law enforcement, where excessive force is legitimized by claims of self-defense, threatening the very fabric of democratic freedom. The government’s willingness to authorize such measures erodes the boundaries between public security and personal safety, raising questions about the future of peaceful protest in India.

Iran denies US talks claim
Dollar Falls Against Japanese Yen as Currency Markets React to Central Bank Actions and Global Economic Uncertainty
Abhijeet Dipke denies plans to enter mainstream politics
Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, Vinod Tomar Acquitted in Sexual Harassment Case
Migrants cross into Ceuta 
