Andhra Pradesh invites tenders for 9 GW data centre 
Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay presents Tamil Nadu budget. 
Mohegan Tribe exits Korea casino project 
Trump Says Iran Talks Are ‘Last Chance’ as Tehran Denies Negotiations Hormuz Crisis Sends Oil Prices Higher 
DMK leads protest in Thanjavur US Supreme Court Grapples with Fate of Birthright Citizenship
** The US Supreme Court appears to be questioning the constitutionality of birthright citizenship, a doctrine that has granted citizenship to millions of Americans born on US soil. President Trump’s attendance at the oral argument has sparked interest and raised the stakes in a highly anticipated case with far-reaching consequences.
supreme court grapples fate:
In a highly anticipated oral argument on Wednesday, the US Supreme Court appeared to be questioning the constitutionality of birthright citizenship, a doctrine that has been a cornerstone of American law for over a century. The high-stakes case drew an unusual in-person appearance from President Trump, who was visibly present in the courtroom.
The landmark case, which centers on the definition of citizenship, specifically hinges on a 14th Amendment clause that grants US citizenship to anyone born on American soil. A group of states has argued that this interpretation is too broad and has led to unintended consequences, including the naturalization of children born to undocumented immigrants. On the other side of the debate, advocacy groups have countered that the clause is crystal clear in its intent and must be upheld to maintain fundamental American values.
In what has been interpreted as an extraordinary display of presidential interest, President Trump attended the oral argument, breaking from the tradition of remote observation or written submission. By his presence, the president demonstrated the high level of scrutiny and attention surrounding the challenge to birthright citizenship. Supreme Court justices posed pointed questions to both parties, including the attorneys representing the states and advocacy groups, in an effort to clarify the contentious issues and ultimately render a verdict.
Key legal experts have cautioned against drawing definitive conclusions based on the justices’ queries during the oral argument, emphasizing that the final verdict could still go either way. However, the intensity and range of the questions did suggest a degree of skepticism from the bench regarding the current interpretation of birthright citizenship.
A ruling on the case is expected in the coming months, with far-reaching consequences for millions of individuals across the United States, particularly those with ancestral ties to various countries in Central and South America. The Supreme Court’s decision will be watched closely by immigration policy advocates, lawmakers, and, of course, the 40 million children and adults who are or have been US citizens by birth.
